Need help? We are here

Rewriting and critiquing the proposal .

In this assignment, you will be rewriting and critiquing the proposal . There are at least six improvements to be made in the document. Your job is to identify the six improvements and then, using track changes, rewrite or fix the error. Also, using the comments tool, give a brief explanation to why it is wrong and why you fixed it the way you did.

This is a formal proposal. This means you should be reviewing and editing the proposal with an eye towards global issues: organization, professional tone, readability, relevance, etc.

Refer to your textbook as need to review how considerations such as organization, professional tone, readability, relevance, etc. may need to be approached differently in a proposal compared to other forms of technical writing you have demonstrated in this course.

There will be local errors to fix, but don’t lose sight of the global issues that impact the proposals coherence and professionalism.

Note: If your word processing program does not have track changes, you will need to insert comments in brackets using red font at the improvement location.

In your document, you should:

1.Identify at least six proposal weaknesses using track changes.

2.Include a critique paragraph of at least 150 words at the end of the document that summarizes the weaknesses.

3.Discuss improvements for each of the weaknesses in your critique.

4.Ensure both the comments and critique are concise and error-free.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

1.This course requires use of the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS).

2.Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

3.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

Critique a proposal to identify areas of weakness and suggest improvements.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Scholar conversations are designed to be virtual discussions within groups. For this discussion students should start by watching this interview

Scholar conversations are designed to be virtual discussions within groups. For this discussion, students should start by watching this interview with Dr. Sara Maxwell, professor at UWB.Also, read this paper written by Dr. Maxwell. There will be a brief 5-question concept quiz about the reading directly after this discussion.https://youtu.be/bqyTaPofSpkDiscussion GuidelinesYou

Safety Assessments For SteviaNonnutritive sweeteners NNS have been suggested for use in connection with improving oral health diabetes care general

Safety Assessments For SteviaNon-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) have been suggested for use in connection with improving oral health, diabetes care, general reductions in caloric intake, and as anti-hypertensive agents etc.Over the years, many NNS (e.g. cyclamate, aspartame) have also been associated with public concern over safety. Sugar substitutes, low calorie sweeteners

Scenario Changing access controls can have some undesirable effects. Therefore it is important to carefully consider changes before making them

ScenarioChanging access controls can have some undesirable effects. Therefore, it is important to carefullyconsider changes before making them and provide mechanisms to reverse changes if they haveunexpected consequences.Always Fresh management has asked you to develop procedures for changing any access controls.The purpose of these procedures is to ensure that staff:?