In this assignment, you will be rewriting and critiquing the proposal . There are at least six improvements to be made in the document. Your job is to identify the six improvements and then, using track changes, rewrite or fix the error. Also, using the comments tool, give a brief explanation to why it is wrong and why you fixed it the way you did.
This is a formal proposal. This means you should be reviewing and editing the proposal with an eye towards global issues: organization, professional tone, readability, relevance, etc.
Refer to your textbook as need to review how considerations such as organization, professional tone, readability, relevance, etc. may need to be approached differently in a proposal compared to other forms of technical writing you have demonstrated in this course.
There will be local errors to fix, but don’t lose sight of the global issues that impact the proposals coherence and professionalism.
Note: If your word processing program does not have track changes, you will need to insert comments in brackets using red font at the improvement location.
In your document, you should:
1.Identify at least six proposal weaknesses using track changes.
2.Include a critique paragraph of at least 150 words at the end of the document that summarizes the weaknesses.
3.Discuss improvements for each of the weaknesses in your critique.
4.Ensure both the comments and critique are concise and error-free.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
1.This course requires use of the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS).
2.Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
3.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Critique a proposal to identify areas of weakness and suggest improvements.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.