Need help? We are here

Clearly and concisely details a critical narrative

Task 1 Assessment Criteria (equally weighted) 
 1. The submitted task clearly and concisely details a critical narrative of a personal learning experience that includes orientation, action and reaction to the incident. The selected incident demonstrates the ability to identify and make pertinent observations about learners, learning sites and learning contexts from personal experience. 
 2. The submitted task makes meaning of the incident presented through in-depth discussion exploring teaching and learning identity and an emerging pedagogical positioning. 
 3. The paper critically analyses the narrative through an analytical lens to develop an interpretative discussion. This analytical lens includes: critical evaluation of the embedded beliefs, values and practices; highlighting disjunctions or paradoxes; and synthesizing the remaining questions or gaps that need further consideration. 
 4. The submitted task is free from spelling, grammatical and typographical errors. It meets the required length and complies with Australian academic rules and conventions. It is referenced as necessary to strengthen your analysis of your narrative incident through the consistent and accurate use of a recognised referencing convention – we ask you to use Harvard: Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness, Jossesy-Bass: San Francisco Beattie, M. (2007) The Art of Learning to Teach, Pearson: Upper Saddle River
 Zima, P. (2002) Deconstruction and critical theory, Continuum: London

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Introduction When it comes to improving the transmission system to meet our nations growing electricity demands companies not only face

IntroductionWhen it comes to improving the transmission system to meet our nation’s growing electricity demands, companies not only face financial complications but also social complications. The concept of “NIMBY” (Not in My Backyard) has proven to be a strong influencing factor on the advancement of much-needed energy infrastructure updates.Many environmental

Linux Implementation Proposal: Client Response Memo Hide Assignment InformationTurnitinThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.Instructions Faster Computing was impressed with

Linux Implementation Proposal: Client Response MemoHide Assignment InformationTurnitin®This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.InstructionsFaster Computing was impressed with your presentation. The company is interested in moving forward with the project, but the senior management team has responded to the presentation with the following questions and concerns:(12.3.2: Describe the implementation of

Learn About creating good password security. An IT Security consultant has made three primary recommendations regarding passwords: Prohibit guessable passwords

Learn About creating good password security.An IT Security consultant has made three primary recommendations regarding passwords:Prohibit guessable passwordssuch as common names, real words, numbers onlyrequire special characters and a mix of caps, lower case and numbers in passwordsReauthenticate before changing passwordsuser must enter old pwbefore creating new oneMake authenticators unforgeabledo

Locatetwo U.S. Supreme Court cases that discuss violent crimes and various types of criminal defenses. https:www.supremecourt.govsearchcenter.aspx Writea 700

Locatetwo U.S. Supreme Court cases that discuss violent crimes and various types of criminal defenses.https://www.supremecourt.gov/search_center.aspxWritea 700- to 1,050-word case analysis in which you identify and examine the types of criminal defenses that were used. Include the following:Explain the nature and types of defenses used in the cases. What evidence was